Make vs Bardeen: Features, Pricing and Verdict
Make is a cloud workflow builder; Bardeen is a browser tool for scraping and lead enrichment. Compare features, pricing, and the right pick for each job.
By Galactic News Editorial · Published 2026-11-09T10:21:04+00:00 · Updated 2026-11-09T10:21:04+00:00
Make vs Bardeen: Features, Pricing and Verdict
Make and Bardeen solve different automation problems. Make is a visual workflow builder that connects apps in the cloud. Bardeen is a browser extension that automates work inside web pages, with a focus on scraping and sales prospecting. If you want scheduled workflows across hundreds of apps, Make fits. If you want to pull data out of websites and enrich leads, Bardeen fits. This comparison covers features, pricing, and the right pick for each use case.
Make vs Bardeen at a glance
| Attribute | Make | Bardeen |
|---|---|---|
| Core model | Cloud workflow builder (scenarios) | Browser extension with AI agents |
| Where it runs | Make servers, on a schedule or webhook | Inside your Chrome browser |
| App library | More than 1,000 apps | Focused on web scraping and sales tools |
| Best for | Multi-step workflows across apps | Scraping, enrichment, lead sourcing |
| Code support | Built-in functions, HTTP, custom apps | AI-built automations, no code needed |
| Free tier | 1,000 credits a month | 100 credits a month, always free |
| Paid plans from | $9 a month (annual billing) | $10 a month |
| Billing unit | Credit per module action | Credit per output row |
What Make does best
Make builds scenarios. A scenario is a visual workflow of modules. Each module is one step, such as reading a row, sending a message, or updating a record. You drag modules onto a canvas and link them. Routers split one flow into branches. Filters decide which records pass through. This visual style makes long workflows easy to read and debug.
Make runs in the cloud. Scenarios trigger on a schedule, on a webhook, or when an app event fires. The free plan checks on a 15-minute interval. Paid plans run as often as every minute. Your computer can stay off while scenarios run.
Make charges by credits. Since August 2025, the credit is the billing unit. Most module actions cost one credit. Routers and error-handler modules cost nothing. The free plan includes 1,000 credits a month and two active scenarios. That is enough to test real workflows before paying.
Make also offers a public API with more than 300 endpoints. You can manage scenarios and executions from your own code. Custom apps let you connect any service with a public API. Enterprise plans add single sign-on, audit logs, and premium apps such as Workday and ServiceNow.
What Bardeen does best
Bardeen lives in your browser. It automates the work you do on web pages. Its strongest feature is scraping. You can pull lists of profiles, search results, or product pages into a sheet. You can then enrich those rows with contact details and company data. This makes Bardeen a natural fit for sales and recruiting teams.
Bardeen charges by output rows, not by runs. A scraper row costs one credit. A web search row costs one credit. An AI tool row costs one credit. An enrichment row costs three credits. Utilities, imports, and exports cost nothing. Every account gets 100 credits free each month. Unused credits expire at the end of each billing period.
Bardeen leans on AI agents. You describe the task in plain words, and Bardeen builds the automation. That lowers the learning curve for non-technical users. It also means less control than Make's visual builder. Complex branching logic is harder to express in Bardeen than in Make.
Bardeen's browser focus is also a limit. Automations run while your browser is open. They depend on the pages you visit. Make's cloud schedules keep running without you. For background jobs that must run overnight, Make is the safer choice.
Make vs Bardeen pricing
Both tools use credits, but the credits mean different things. A Make credit is one module action. A Bardeen credit is one output row. You cannot compare the two price lists directly. Compare them against your own workload instead.
| Plan | Make | Bardeen |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0, 1,000 credits a month, 2 scenarios | $0, 100 credits a month, always free |
| Entry paid | Core from $9 a month (annual), 10,000 credits | Basic $10 a month, 100 extra credits |
| Mid paid | Pro from $16 a month (annual), 10,000 credits | Premium $50 a month, 1,000 extra credits |
| Annual deal | Monthly billing costs more than annual | Premium $480 a year, a 20% saving |
| Top tier | Teams from $29 a month (annual) | Enterprise, custom pricing |
Make's paid tiers all start at 10,000 credits. The higher tiers buy features, not volume. Pro adds priority execution, custom variables, and full-text log search. Teams adds team roles and shared templates. You buy extra credits when volume grows.
Bardeen's Basic plan is cheap but thin. It adds only 100 credits a month on top of the free 100. Heavy scrapers will burn through that fast. Premium is the realistic paid tier for regular prospecting. It adds 1,000 credits a month. Enrichment rows cost three credits each, so budget for that multiplier.
Prices change. Check each vendor's pricing page before you buy. The figures above reflect the pages checked on 9 November 2026.
Which one fits your work?
Choose Make when your work spans many apps. It fits order processing, syncing records between tools, and scheduled reporting. Its visual builder handles branching and error handling well. Its cloud runs keep working when your laptop sleeps.
Choose Bardeen when your work starts in the browser. It fits building lead lists, scraping competitor pages, and enriching contacts. Its AI builder gets a first automation running fast. Its per-row pricing is simple to forecast for list work.
Some teams use both. Bardeen scrapes and enriches a lead list. Make moves that list into a CRM and triggers follow-up steps. The two tools do not overlap much. That is why the choice is rarely either-or for larger teams.
Ask these questions before you decide:
- Does the work start on a web page or in an app?
- Must it run on a schedule without your browser open?
- How many rows or module actions will it use each month?
- Do you need branching, filters, and error handling?
- Is lead enrichment the core job, or just one step?
Bottom line
Make is the better general automation platform. It connects more apps, runs in the cloud, and handles complex logic. Bardeen is the better scraping and prospecting tool. It pulls data from pages and enriches it with less setup. Pick Make for workflows. Pick Bardeen for web data and leads. If you do both jobs, use both tools and let each do what it does best.