Zapier vs Make: Features, Pricing and Verdict

Zapier vs Make compared on features, pricing, and verdict: Zapier leads on app coverage with 9,000+ apps, while Make wins on price per run today.

By Galactic News Editorial · Published 2026-11-10T07:24:18+00:00 · Updated 2026-11-10T07:24:18+00:00

Zapier vs Make: Features, Pricing and Verdict

Zapier and Make are the two best-known no-code automation platforms. Both connect apps and move data between them. They differ in how they charge, how they build, and who they suit best. This comparison covers features, pricing, and the verdict for each type of buyer.

The short answer: Zapier wins on app count and ease of use. Make wins on price per run and visual building. Most solo users and small teams will pay less on Make. Most teams that need the widest app coverage will pick Zapier.

Zapier vs Make at a glance

How Zapier vs Make pricing works

Pricing is where the two platforms differ most. Zapier charges per task. A task is one successful action step in a Zap. Triggers do not count. Built-in tools such as Filter, Formatter, Paths, and Delay do not count either. Zapier's own pricing page states this plainly.

Zapier's free plan costs $0 and includes 100 tasks a month. Every Zap is limited to two steps. Professional starts at $19.99 a month billed annually, or $29.99 billed monthly, for 750 tasks. It adds multi-step Zaps, premium apps, webhooks, and faster polling. Team starts at $69 a month billed annually, or $103.50 monthly, for 2,000 tasks and up to 25 users. Enterprise is custom priced.

Make charges per credit. Each module action in a scenario counts as one credit. That includes the trigger module, which Zapier does not charge for. Make's free plan costs $0 and includes up to 1,000 credits a month, with two active scenarios and a 15-minute minimum run interval.

Make's paid plans all start at 10,000 credits a month. Core is the cheapest paid tier, from $9 a month billed annually. Pro adds priority execution, custom variables, and full-text log search. Teams adds team roles and shared templates. Enterprise is custom priced with overage protection and 24/7 support. Make's pricing page notes annual billing saves 15% or more. Prices have moved several times during 2026, so check the live page before buying.

The billing units are not equal. A Zapier task and a Make credit both cover one action. But a Make scenario with five modules costs five credits per run, trigger included. The same flow in Zapier costs four tasks, since the trigger is free. Even so, Make's 10,000-credit allowance dwarfs Zapier's 750-task starting tier at a lower price. High-volume users usually pay less on Make.

Zapier vs Make features compared

Zapier connects to more than 9,000 apps, according to its pricing page. Make lists more than 3,500 apps. For common tools such as Gmail, Slack, Sheets, and HubSpot, both cover the need. For niche or industry-specific apps, Zapier is more likely to have a ready connector.

The builders feel different. Zapier builds in a straight line. Each Zap is a trigger followed by steps. That is easy to learn. Make builds on a visual canvas. Modules connect with lines, and routers split one flow into branches. Complex logic is easier to see on Make's canvas. It is also easier to get lost in.

Both platforms now lean into AI. Zapier offers AI fields, Copilot for building Zaps, MCP for letting AI assistants act across apps, and an SDK for code-based access. Make offers Maia, a conversational builder, AI agents, and more than 350 AI apps in its ecosystem. Neither platform is clearly ahead on AI. The choice depends on which AI tools you already use.

Error handling differs in style. Zapier offers Zap version control, custom error notifications, and advanced settings on paid plans. Make offers visual execution logs, full-text log search on Pro, and error handlers you can attach to any module. Both let you retry failed runs.

Zapier vs Make for teams

Zapier's Team plan includes 25 users, shared Zaps and folders, shared app connections, and SAML single sign-on. Enterprise adds unlimited users, advanced admin controls, and a technical account manager. Free and Professional are single-user plans.

Make's Teams plan adds team roles and shared scenario templates. Its pricing page lists unlimited users as a platform feature. Enterprise adds custom functions, enterprise app integrations, and advanced security. Small teams often find Make's team features cheaper to reach, since the paid tiers start at lower prices.

Which one should you choose?

Choose Zapier if you need the widest app coverage. Choose it if your team is non-technical and wants the simplest builder. Choose it if your key apps only exist in Zapier's directory. The premium is real, but so is the coverage.

Choose Make if you run high volumes. Choose it if your flows branch, loop, or transform data in complex ways. Choose it if you like seeing the whole workflow on one canvas. The lower price per run adds up fast.

Try both free plans before paying. Zapier's free plan gives 100 tasks a month. Make's free plan gives up to 1,000 credits a month. Build the same real workflow in each. The one that feels clearer is the one to keep.

Switching between Zapier and Make

Moving from one platform to the other takes planning. Neither tool offers a one-click import of the other's workflows. Expect to rebuild each automation by hand. Start with the workflows that run most often. Those deliver the biggest saving first.

Map each Zap to a Make scenario before you rebuild it. Zapier's linear steps become Make modules on a canvas. A Zapier Path becomes a Make router. A Zapier Filter becomes a Make filter on the connection between two modules. The logic is the same. The layout is different.

Watch the billing unit when you switch. A flow that costs four tasks per run in Zapier may cost five credits in Make, because Make charges for the trigger module too. Count the modules in each scenario before you estimate the monthly cost. Run both platforms side by side for two weeks. Compare the real usage, not the estimate.

Keep the old account active until the new flows prove stable. Turn off one workflow at a time, not all at once. If a rebuilt scenario fails, the original is still there to fall back on. Once the new setup runs clean for a full billing cycle, cancel the old plan.

Bottom line

Zapier vs Make comes down to coverage against cost. Zapier offers 9,000+ apps and the simplest builder, from $19.99 a month for 750 tasks. Make offers 10,000 credits from $9 a month and a stronger visual builder for complex flows. For most buyers, Make is the better value. For teams that need rare integrations or the simplest setup, Zapier earns its premium.